Here we go again.
I hope this court order doesn’t cause the 100 meters US Trials to be delayed by several days.
If history repeats itself, you may remember the incident at the 1992 US Trials.
In 1990, Butch Reynolds was banned two years by the IAAF.
The United States Olympic Committee (USOC) cleared Butch Reynolds to run at the 1992 US trials, but not the International Olympic Committee (IOC) nor the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF).
The 400 meters was delayed for four days because of the fear over the IAAF “tainted” rule. Simply put, anyone who ran against Butch Reynolds was considered tainted and would also have a 2 year ban imposed on them. They even considered having Butch running alone in a seperate heat!
The IAAF backed down temporarily, but later banned him from competing in the 1992 Olympics.
Butch Reynolds finished 5th at the Trials and was named as an alternate to the 4x400m relay.
Here is the Justin Gatlin article from Google news:
Gatlin files suit in effort to compete at trials
Banned sprinter Justin Gatlin filed a lawsuit Monday in a last-ditch effort to compete at the U.S. Olympic track and field trials in less than three weeks.
The complaint alleges that penalizing Gatlin for a 2001 doping violation, which involved medication he was taking for attention deficit disorder, violates the Americans with Disability Act.
Gatlin’s lawyer, Joe Zarzaur, said they will request an injunction to allow him to compete at the trials, which begin June 27 in Eugene, Ore. He said he did not know when the case would be heard.
The suit was filed in U.S. District Court in Gatlin’s hometown of Pensacola, Fla.
On Friday, the Court of Arbitration for Sport upheld a four-year doping ban against the reigning Olympic 100-meter gold medalist. Gatlin asked CAS to rescind the 2001 doping violation — his first of two — which he had hoped would reduce his penalty to a two-year ban, allowing him to compete at trials.
Instead, CAS rejected that argument and changed the start of Gatlin’s ban to July 25, 2006 — the day he voluntarily accepted his provisional suspension — instead of May 25, 2006. So he wouldn’t be reinstated before the trials even if his ban had been reduced from four years to two.
Zarzaur said he also would ask the court to change the dates of the doping ban.
The 26-year-old Gatlin, who insists he never knowingly took performance-enhancing drugs, tested positive for excessive testosterone at the Kansas Relays in 2006.
Named as defendants in the suit are the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, USA Track and Field, the U.S. Olympic Committee and the International Association of Athletics Federations.
USATF spokeswoman Jill Geer said the federation had to review the suit before commenting. A message left at Gatlin’s parents’ home was not immediately returned.
Another potential roadblock is jurisdiction. CAS secretary general Matthieu Reeb said Friday the only legal option he knew of for Gatlin was to go before the Swiss Federal Tribunal, an appeal provided by Swiss law because CAS is based in Switzerland.
“We view this as an anti-doping matter and believe the appropriate forum for adjudication and resolution is through the American Arbitration Association or the International Court of Arbitration for Sport,” USOC spokesman Darryl Seibel said.
The contention that Gatlin’s first doping ban violated the ADA was raised by a member of the U.S. arbitration panel that reduced his ban from eight years to four in January. Christopher L. Campbell, in a dissenting opinion, called it “blatant discrimination.”
The suit alleges the defendants never provided Gatlin with information that Adderall, the drug he was prescribed, or any other ADD medications “could pose drug testing issues for a USATF event.”
While competing for the University of Tennessee, Gatlin would stop taking Adderall a few days before a meet and never had a positive test. He followed the same routine before competing at the 2001 junior nationals, according to the lawsuit, but tested positive there for amphetamines.
Gatlin was suspended from international competition for two years, but the sport’s governing body reinstated him after one year. Still, the IAAF warned Gatlin then that the 2001 incident counted as a doping violation and another would mean a lifetime ban.
Jimson Lee
Latest posts by Jimson Lee (see all)
Leave a Reply