• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Click here to download the  free ebook of Alberto Juantorena’s  detailed training workouts leading up to the 1976 Montreal Olympics

SpeedEndurance.com

Success in Track & Field ... and Life

  • Home
    • About
    • Contact
  • Track & Field
    • 400 meters
    • 800m & Mile
    • 1/2 & Full Marathons
    • Long & Triple Jump
    • Hurdles
  • Training
    • Weight Training
    • Abs & Core
    • Injury Prevention
    • Shoes & Spikes
    • Masters
  • Coaching
    • Freelap Friday Five
    • Interviews
    • Sports Nutrition
    • Sport Psychology
  • Archives
  • Shop
    • My account
    • Checkout
    • Basket

TRUTH or CRAP? 40 Yard Dash to Determine 400 meter Potential

You are here: Home / 40 Yard Dash / TRUTH or CRAP? 40 Yard Dash to Determine 400 meter Potential
10
SHARES
FacebookTwitter

August 10, 2010 by Jimson Lee 21 Comments

One of the quickest and oldest 40 yard dash predictor for 400 meter talent (or any sprinting distance) is running a 40 yard dash. Then,

  • For Male athletes = (Time for 40 yards × 10) + 2 seconds
  • For Female athletes = (Time for 40 yards × 10) + 4 seconds

Thus, for a man, a 4.6 40 yard dash is (4.6 seconds x 10) + 2 = 48.0

Now, it’s not saying that a 4.6 40 yard guy WILL run 48 flat for 400m, though funnily enough, my 40 yard dash was 4.6 and I ran 48.36.

It’s saying a 4.6 40 yard dash has the POTENTIAL of running 48 seconds for 400 meters based on raw speed.

As Jared Deacon nicely pointed out, speed is the key… your 400m is based on your 200 time, your 200m is based on your 100 time, your 100m is based on your 60 time, your 60m is based on your 30 time.  Or 40 yard or 36.6 meters.

The following chart are National norms using hand times for 16 to 19 year olds.  Where do you rank?  What is your best 40 yard dash time and 400 meter time?  How accurate is this formula?

40 Yard Dash Rating Davis Table

See also  Decathlon Secrets: World's Greatest Athlete - Day 1

Category icon40 Yard Dash,  400 meters,  Fitness Testing,  Track & Field

About Jimson Lee

I am a Masters Athlete and Coach currently based in London UK. My other projects include the Bud Winter Foundation, writer for the IAAF New Studies in Athletics Journal (NSA) and a member of the Track & Field Writers of America.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Andy Cano says

    August 10, 2010 at 12:51 pm

    That is just another conjectural, theoretical model that is CRAP! In the first instance, 40 yard dash times are universally INNACURATE unless they are extrapolated from a fully automatically timed race (FAT). If you are referring to NFL “times” or other informal clockings, that is pure hyperbole and FICTION.

    In the second instance, the 400 meter race has a large component of fitness (stamina). This is something that can be acquired through training. That is how Jeremy Wariner can run faster 400 meter times than Tyson Gay–43.45 seconds as compared to 44.89 seconds, (although not Gay’s specialty). Butch Reynolds and Lee Evans were not regarded as “speed burners”, but they were among the greatest 400 meter specialists of all time–through stamina. Let me give you another illustration of how fitness or a lack of fitness can determine one’s 400 meter potential. Usain Bolt has a PR and world record of 19.19 seconds for the 200 meter dash. By any reasonable calculation, he should be able to run 2 (20.7) 200 meter segments, if he were fit. This would result in a phenomenal time of 41.4 seconds for the 400 meter race. You, I, and the readers know that is not going to happen because Bolt hates the 400 meter dash and the effort required to excel at it–notwithstanding the advantage of supernatural speed.

    Reply
  2. Ryan Banta says

    August 11, 2010 at 9:39 am

    I believe if you read transfer of training if would be better to go just above or below to get close to the predictor of times. As for potential in the long run is truely anyones guess. As kids develope on many different levels.

    Reply
  3. Dan says

    August 13, 2010 at 6:00 pm

    Am I the only one who thinks the chart is a little “harsh”? 4.3-4.4 is only average? As a coincidence, the formula actually worked for me. I ran 4.61 electric for 40 yards my sophomore year of college and ran 48.4 my senior year. I feel I should have run 47-mid or better, so I definitely agree that the 40-yard predictor is just a guess.

    Reply
  4. Ian Warner says

    August 15, 2010 at 8:07 pm

    I would have to agree with the first comment as this just does not seem to add up. I feel like you find a few athletes who this works for but you will find a much larger percentage that is way off. The 40 is well the 40, it is a test that is used in football but does not tell much about what a football player can do never mind what can be done in a 400.

    Reply
  5. Money says

    August 16, 2010 at 9:12 pm

    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. There are two great DVD’s on training the fron’t end of the race first,one by Toneys Wells and Caryl Smith, their DVD can be found at. http://www.track-tech.com A 4 dvd set for 30.00 and the other by William Freeman formal usatf chairman. You can find Freeman DVD at championship production. You guys have problems. You talk as if you know everything, but I’m willing to bet you haven’t produce anything. And if you have you only want the elite athletes.I have been coaching track and field for the past 7 years and I have discovered a workout that really works and the results for the 100 meters is 10.50 or better in 6 months and 21.15 for the 200 meters.If you have a guy that runs 11.2 and can bech about 200-225 he should be able to run these times. I have seen and heard of guys like you that dispute everything. I have been with the so called NSCA and what ever certification you want to call it, level 1-3 usatf and they are funny. Lot of paper work and nothing else. I wish they had a contest to see who could produce the fastest boy sprinter in 6 months and let all the athletes have equal times and ability, I would make you guys look like a fool!

    Reply
  6. Dan says

    August 17, 2010 at 4:12 pm

    @Money – what are you talking about and why are you so angry? I’m not sure why you seem to be talking smack when it doesn’t appear that you have been called out by anyone. Just curious, I don’t really understand your post beyond the fact that you have been able to coach some kids to run fast and apparently the rest of the world has not.

    Reply
  7. Money says

    August 17, 2010 at 5:21 pm

    Sorry, just dissapointed with all this stuff about why would you call the 40 meter yard dash crap or fact. If you as a coach don’t believe in the 30-40 training theory then say it! In the above article,these are elite athletes! these are not club or high school athletes. When training 400 meters you have many parts of the race you have to train. When training for the 400 meter dash, many coaches train different.Some train the anaerobic alactic system first and some start with long anaerobic endurance system from 150-600 meters. As a coach, I have found it much easier to start with anaerobic alactic and work around until I reach my goal of training either to 500 or 600 meters in distant. When I train anaerobic alactic,I train from 10-80. As a formal coach, When training anaerobic alactic first, It helps the sprinter to develop proper running mechians and I have never had a sprinter to pull when training from short to long.

    Reply
  8. Aaron says

    August 21, 2010 at 5:57 pm

    is 50.32 a good 400m for a 10th grader i was 15 at the time now im goin to the 11th grade next month

    Reply
  9. Markham says

    August 23, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    It’s interesting but probably only useful for athletes who have the desire, mental toughness and desire to run the 400 in the first place, which greatly reduces its value as a 400m time predictor.

    After if you’ve spent more than say 2-3 years competing as a sprinter at the high school level (let alone beyond that), you’ve met those athletes who have great speed for the 60m during the indoor season but are TERRIBLE at the 200 OR maybe they’re good at the 100/200 but just fall apart over the last 1/2 of the 400.

    And we’ve also met the guys who have good speed who say are jumpers or 100m guys, etc, and they run an amazing 400 the first time out, because they have great natural endurance and have the toughness component.

    Speed is a huge component, sure.

    But without the stamina (and to some degree you’re born with that potential wise), and the raw drive and toughness you still won’t run well.

    Plus you have to figure out how to train that particular athlete.

    When I was in HS, College and now in the Masters ranks, I seem to benefit from focusing on my long sprint endurance first and the doing the short stuff. I tried to do things the opposite way when I first came back (to masters), and just succeeded in hurting myself.

    So I trained like a 400/800 guy for a bit, came back and had a huge PR in the 200 – go figure.

    According to Clyde Hart Michael Johnson rarely did speed work and much of his routine looks like 400/800 or at least a 400mh.

    So while it would be a good predictor for a 400m specialist as far as top potential, I think it’s rather limited for sprinters in general.

    In the end I think the 200 and really the 300 are better predictors, because as any competitive sprinter knows all sorts of things happen from 60-100-200 meters, which really determine what kind of sprinter you are.

    Two guys could have similar 200 times, but guy A finishes strong and guy B has been hanging on for the last 60 meters of the race.

    Chances are, guy A is gonna run a better 400m all things being equal training wise.

    -M

    Reply
  10. Money says

    August 24, 2010 at 3:33 am

    Hello Aaron, 50.32 is a good time for 400 meters if it was eletronic time.

    Reply
  11. Aaron says

    August 27, 2010 at 8:03 pm

    Yea it was electronic but i feel i need to be in the 47s or 48s as a junior do you have any tips or strategies for me to get there?

    Reply
  12. Money says

    August 29, 2010 at 4:53 pm

    Do you run in california? if so,what school.What was your best 100 meter time? what was your best 200 meter time? It wouldn’t do me any good to give you any tips because when you start training with your coach, he is probably going to do something totally different and that will cause confusion between you and him. Also,it is very disrespectful for any coach to interfear with another coach athletes even if they are not in training season. If he told me I could, then I would help. Be patient,seems to me that your coach hasen’t done a bad job. Are flexable? are you in the weight room, these are things you should be working on now. In your regular season, you should run as many 4 x 100 relays,100-200 races as possible.

    Reply
  13. Aaron says

    August 30, 2010 at 5:14 pm

    yea i run in california and my best 200 is not good to me its 22.8 im not sure about my 100 and in meets i run the open 400 , 200 and 4×4

    Reply
  14. Money says

    August 31, 2010 at 9:28 am

    What school do you run at, if you don’t mine telling me. Im in the northern Sacramento area. What’s your 1 rep max for the bench press, cling, and squat.

    Reply
  15. hugh says

    September 2, 2010 at 4:27 pm

    too many outside factors for the 40yard test to indicate 400 times. no real correlation like that between 100 and the 60 , ie alot happens between 60m 70m 80m 90m , strength plays a huge factor and so speed endurance is non existent over 40yards where it plays a part for the 100m sprinter, where it is an absolute must for the 400m sprinter

    Reply
  16. Carnegie says

    September 2, 2010 at 8:31 pm

    I think I would have to call it crap! How many football/track guys with (great 40 yard times) run a good 400 meters? Hell most coaches, can’t get them to run a 350m TT. The (400 meters is mostly a speed endurance race), that is why most sub (44)400 meters runners can run under 1:15 in the 600 meters.

    Reply
  17. Aaron says

    September 3, 2010 at 9:57 am

    @ money im in the la city area & its 165 right now not sure about the squat

    Reply
  18. Leo says

    October 27, 2010 at 1:36 am

    What’s the big deal with numbers? Just run. If you’re fast, you’ll know it. If not, train and you will be faster. When I was a kid we ran from dogs, chased kids on bikes, ran from the car we just plugged with a snowball, played hoop, football, or whatever, chased a frisbee or fly-balls for hours, ran hills, chased chicks, ran from the police, played ding dong ditch, jumped in pools and ran, climbed fences trees, etc. We did absolutely no endurance work, no strength work, no work at all. Just had fun. And during track, we kicked axx.

    Reply
  19. Thinker says

    November 2, 2010 at 4:54 pm

    I am not sure whether the table is for 30 meter time or 40 yard dash time. It seems these numbers are very fast for 40 yard dash.

    Reply
  20. Jimson Lee says

    November 3, 2010 at 4:58 am

    After reading the comments, I double checked the reference and I think they made a mistake. They have the exact same table for both 30 meters AND 40 yard dash (~37 meters) test. So it’s possible the chart was for 30 meters.

    https://speedendurance.com/2010/10/10/the-soccer-football-30-meter-sprint-test/

    Reply
  21. Jessie says

    January 15, 2011 at 9:32 pm

    It seems to me that it would be much more accurate to find the coraltion between 40 times and 400 times if you took elite 400 meter runners (who are close to their “potential”) and time them in the 40 yd dash…….I would asume that a collegite athlete that can run a 48 or 47 400 could easily run a 4.8 or 4.7 40;at the same time im sure their are plenty of high school kids that can run a 4.6 40 that could not run better than a 50. or 49. quarter. Maybe after years of training to carry their speed down the track for 400 meters to get to their potential 400 time.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Recommended

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xbs-aWxyLk

Shop Our Store

  • Bud Winter (9)
  • Championship Productions (6)
  • Clyde Hart (2)
  • Derek Hansen (1)
  • Electrical Muscle Stimulation (2)
  • Jim Hiserman (6)
  • Jimson Lee (4)
  • Uncategorised (0)

Articles by Category

Products

  • Jim Hiserman - Developing 800m Runners: Identifying, Categorizing and Developing 400m-800m Type Athletes $42.99 $39.99
  • Private Coaching - Monthly Plan $600.00 $525.00
  • Jim Hiserman-Developing-Distance-Runnersv2 Jim Hiserman - Developing Distance Runners Volume 2: A Systematic Approach to Developing Individual Success within a Dynamic Team Culture $34.95 $29.95
  • Feed-the-Cats-Clinic-3-Pack-701 'Feed the Cats' Clinic 3-Pack $64.99
  • Tony Holler's Feed the Cats": A Complete Sprint Training Program Tony Holler's "Feed the Cats" Complete Sprint Training Program $49.99
  • Bud Winter and Speed City presents Arthur Lydiard 509x716 Bud Winter & Arthur Lydiard MP3 [Download only] $9.99

RECENT POSTS

  • Oregon22 Coaches Club now Online
  • IFAC 2022: The Return of In-Person Conferences (with Virtual option)
  • Here is our 400m Discussion Recording… over 2 Hours Long
  • The Best Free Coaching Book – post Beijing 2022 Olympics
  • The Ultimate 400m Track Webinar for Coaches & Athletes
  • NACAC Athletics Coaching Science Series 2022
  • Top Six 400m Predictor Workouts (Number 4 is my Favourite)
  • Best 6 Podcasts for 2021 (and Beyond)
  • Why Karsten Warholm’s 45.94 400mH WR is my Highlight of 2021
  • Sprinting: 10 Research Articles for Effective Sprint Training [Part 23]

Copyright © 2023. SpeedEndurance.com is owned and operated by Aryta Ltd. Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}