The recent talk about Tyson Gay’s injuries leads me to ask the question:
When should you stop thinking of “performance”, and focus on “maintenance”?
Or perhaps move up in distance?
After Tyson Gay scratched out of the 100 meters semi finals, people suggested he retire, or that he only has “two or three” good races left in his body, or maybe he should have surgery and focus on the London 2012 Games. (i.e. forget the relay at World Champs, buddy)
Asafa Powell, A Great Role Model
To answer the question on Performance vs Maintenance, I think Asafa Powell is a great statistical role model (well, for the first 95 meters that is). He’s been fairly consistent, runs great races early in the year, and has never scrapped an entire season due to injury. Also, his results are well documented.
A while back, I wrote about peaking after a certain number of “training years” (read Masters Track is like a Car: It’s Mileage, not Age that Matters), and it may be time to just maintain your peak form, or simply move up in distance. (read When Athletes Hit a Plateau – Change Distance or Change Training). Quincy Watts, the 1992 400m Barcelona Olympic Champion was plagued by injuries as a 100 meter sprinter, so he moved up to the 400 meters. The results speaks for themselves. (see the video here)
Life is like a roller coaster… you are either going up or going down. Once you reach that crested peak, there’s only one way to go, and that’s downhill. Even more so with Masters athletes… nobody gets better with age, unless you are Mr. Barnwell.
Back to Asafa..
A quick glance shows his last EIGHT years running season bests between 9.70 and 9.90, or the last SEVEN years under 9.82 or less! Incredible.
His recent 9.78 race in 2011 was near perfection, except for the fact that he only “ran” for 95 meters.
By looking at the chart, I feel he still has a chance to run 9.69 given the right wind conditions, altitude, perfect reaction time and race execution. He must, however, run for the full 100 meters (no kidding!). I think 9.58 is out of the question for him, but then again, I have been wrong before. I feel it would be highly suspicious for anyone running between 9.70 and 9.90 for the past 8 years to “suddenly” run 9.58 without some radical change.
Then again, after 8 solid years, I don’t think he should go on a radical weight training or special plyometric training with fantasies of running sub 9.58. His technique is near perfection. He has the best arm synchronicity with his legs compared to the rest of the elite sprinters. I think he should focus on not getting injured and simply go on “maintenance mode” and run sub 9.82 for as long as he can.
Discover more from SpeedEndurance .com
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
what if youve only just started sprinting over the last 2 years but you are 37years old and regardless of what anyone says you still want to sprint – what is the event 100, 200 or 400 that you are most likely to see the best gains in at this age? (p.s I trained for 400m nearly all season but saw little change in time from the year before yet i dropped my 100 down to 11.6 without hardly any short sprint training!!
@doug, if you only have 2 training years under your belt, I think any of the sprints events will do well for you, as long as you can handle and recover from the training. Some of the best M40 400m guys started training serious at age 30 or 31 and they were running high 47 or low 48 by M40 and setting records. The problem with choosing the 100m is you’ll need a good coach with a good eye to catch your technique.